The link to the podcast in iTunes is here
Episode 1: The Next Step in Upstairs Care, Downstairs
The research and evidence for emergency medicine pharmacists is out there in mass quantity. The ASHP Emergency Care section has done the most complete collection of the existing data and links to the manuscripts.
- Medication errors occur in up to 60% of ED patients – Patanwala AE, Warholak TL, Sanders AB, et al. A prospective observational study of medication errors in a tertiary care emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:522-526
- EM pharmacists’ care reduces medication errors – PI is an MD – Rothschild JM, Churchill W, Erickson A, et al. Medication errors recovered by emergency department pharmacists. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:513-521.
- “The pharmacists’ nominally assigned activity—reviewing medication orders—was less important in preventing medication errors than their general availability for discussion and consultation.” – Patanwala AE, Sanders AB, Thomas MC, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of pharmacist activities resulting in medication error interception in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:369-373
Emergencypharmacist.org was a great site run by one of the icons of EM pharmacy – Dan Hays. Unfortunately I do not think it is updated anymore. However, all the resources are still there, and worthwhile checking out.
While this data is plentiful, I do have to admit, from a purely skeptical view of things, each paper is written largely (if not exclusively) by pharmacists. Clearly, we have a vested interest in finding positive results, and there may be some publication bias with respect for other trials where no benefit of an EMP was found (I can already hear the “they took our jobs” in Southpark dialect). But with that said, there is ample opportunity for fair and balanced investigation.
Defining a medication error: “A medication error is “any error occurring in the medication use process”
Defining the medication use process: “Medication use is a complex process that comprises the sub-processes of medication prescribing, order processing, dispensing, administration, and effects monitoring.”
The Joint Commission has once again changed its standard requiring first dose, prospective pharmacy review — a move that should provide some relief to emergency departments nationwide.
The revised standard now allows for an exception to the rule “in urgent situations,” and frees the emergency physician from actually being required to order, prepare and administer the medication by allowing a registered nurse to process and administer the medication if a physician is in the proximity of the patient.
The revisions came after several months of ACEP representatives working with the Joint Commission to find a solution to the concerns facing emergency departments with the standard. ACEP joined forces with AAEM and ENA, and wrote several letters to the Joint Commission since the standard begin Jan. 1. A Joint Commission task force that includes ACEP members will continue to monitor the standard.
“We are pleased that the Joint Commission heard the concerns of the emergency physicians,” said Marilyn Bromley, RN, ACEP’s Director of EM Practice. “We believe these changes still keep the standard’s intent of providing patient safety, but allow for a process in the ED that still manages patient throughput and minimizes treatment delays.”
Perhaps it’s time to address this argument once again, but with a different approach to what and how pharmacists can contribute to emergency medicine.